NAD+ metabolism
Couples nutrient state to repair, and its availability falls measurably with age across tissues. It sits upstream of a great deal of aging physiology, which makes it both a target and a readout.
Science
Guided by the biology of NAD+ metabolism, mitochondrial function, proteostasis and metabolic and renal aging, we train advanced cross-species real-world models on the accumulated phenotypic and multi-modal data of a biobank that we hold under licence.
01
The problem
Aging is the single largest risk factor for the diseases that dominate medicine in later life. Each is studied and treated separately; the process that makes a body susceptible to all of them at once is studied far less.
That process has a shape. Physiological reserve does not fall in a straight line; it decays. That is why an intervention applied early enough, on the right mechanism, does not merely add time: it changes the exponent. Our work is directed at that exponent.
02
Method
No single measurement explains aging, so we do not rely on one. The platform connects genotype, molecular state and physiological outcome across a whole lifespan, and across species.
Genetic reference populations characterised across the lifespan, from lifespan itself to the metabolic and renal phenotypes that mark age-related decline. Genetic diversity is the point: it is what turns a colony into an experiment.
Transcriptomic, proteomic and metabolomic layers across the tissues where aging is decisive, assembled so that they can be read together rather than one at a time.
Systems analysis connecting genotypes to phenotypes (QTL mapping and GWAS, PheWAS, mediation analysis), with machine learning applied across the whole to surface the associations that no single analysis would reach.
Results are cross-validated against human cohorts. This seamless integration of mouse and human data is what makes a finding a candidate for clinical translation rather than a species-specific artefact.
Candidates enter functional validation and a translational pipeline grounded in tissue-level biology.
03
Focus
Four mechanisms, chosen because they are measurable, modifiable, and implicated across more than one age-related disease.
Couples nutrient state to repair, and its availability falls measurably with age across tissues. It sits upstream of a great deal of aging physiology, which makes it both a target and a readout.
Bioenergetic capacity and the quality control that defends it. Tissues fail in ways that track their energetic demand, which is why this recurs across so many age-related conditions.
Protein folding, turnover and clearance. Its failure is one of the most consistent molecular signatures of aged tissue, and one of the clearest points of intervention.
Phenotypes from metabolic disease through kidney decline, tracked longitudinally so that trajectory, not just endpoint, is available to the analysis.
04
Intelligence
Biology sets the questions: which tissue, which timescale, which phenotype actually matters. Computation answers them at a depth and speed that no laboratory could reach unaided.
A model with nothing to learn from produces confident noise; a dataset with no one to read it stays a dataset. Our position is that the two have to be built together, which is the logic of our partnership with Natural Constant.
The biology that sets the questions, the mathematics that helps answer them.
Collaborate